Capital Gains Gone? Housing Faces a Big What-If

Min 1
President Trump is considering a sweeping shift: eliminating federal capital gains taxes on primary residence sales. This marks a significant departure from the current exclusion thresholds—$250,000 for single filers, $500,000 for married couples—that haven’t budged since 1997.
Min 2
The proposal could unlock vast amounts of home equity. Home prices have climbed roughly 187.5% since the exclusion levels were set. Lifting the tax could relieve homeowners who feel “locked in” by tax penalties when considering a move, potentially boosting housing inventory and easing price pressure.
Min 3
But the relief would skew toward wealthier, long-time homeowners. Only about 10–15% of homeowners—those with gains exceeding the current exclusion caps—would actually benefit. These individuals tend to have high net worth, and are more likely to own property in high-cost regions like California or Massachusetts.
Min 4
Retirees stand to gain the most—those older homeowners who’ve built substantial equity may finally be willing to downsize. That shift could help free up larger homes for younger families in markets grappling with low inventory. Still, economists caution that tax reform alone may not be enough to resolve broader affordability issues such as high mortgage rates and stubborn home prices.
Min 5
From where we sit, the proposal offers a clear tactical lever to unlock stuck housing supply. Policymakers will need to balance its upside against downsides—like skewing benefits to the wealthy, potential revenue loss, and the risk of driving home prices higher. A modest tax tweak, yes—but not a market cure-all.
Final Takeaway
Trump’s proposal to scrap capital gains taxes on home sales is provocative and potentially impactful. It could untether reluctant sellers—particularly affluent long-term homeowners and retirees—and nudge more homes into play. But its benefits are uneven, and without broader fixes to affordability, it won’t solve the housing market’s deep structural problems. Fraudulent forward momentum, bold in concept—but still needs real collateral.